« The Fundraiser | Main | People Magazine on the Marty Tankleff Case »

July 16, 2006

Comments

bobby

It wasn't his "false" confession that got him convicted. He testified at his trial and what he said didn't match the evidence. So the jury had no choice but to convict him. He's never getting out of prison.

Sarah

He will get out of prison because he is innocent, he was wrongfully convicted due to a corrupt police department, not because of his testimony. Are we talking about the same case? Why are you here reading this, [email protected], unless you too feel he is innocent?

bobby

No, he will never get out of prison and yes, we're talking about the same case. All he has is a bunch of low-life dirtbags contadicting each other and changing their stories. (Even the few people who are reliable, like the priest, are getting their information from low-life dirtbags.) Even if what they're saying were true all it would show is that other people were involved. It doesn't mean he's innocent.
Throwing enough shit up against the wall to see if some of it will stick is not going to get anybody a new trial. But I guess that is all he and his lawyers have.
Another reason I know he won't get out is that Jay Salpeter tried this exact same thing for Henry Chichester and he's still in prison and never getting out.
When Marty comes up for parole consideration he won't get it because he keeps denying his guilt.

Ron Jackson

I watched the story on 48 Hours and was completely disgusted and felt sick to my stomach after the show was over. This was a total rush to judgement by the lead detective. The use of lying to evoke a confession seems to me to be unjust. A 17 year old put under these circustances can easily be influenced in to thinking he might have done something while "blacked out" if officers are leading him in that direction. Also, Marty requested a lie detector test and the arrogant detective said one wasn't needed because he could tell that he was lying better than a lie detector. WHAT! How come the evidence doesn't point to Marty. Marty's mother showed signs that she fought her attacker yet marty had no marks other than that from is rhinoplasty. The weapons he said he used had no evidence on them. Also, the prosecution's main motive was money, yet Marty wasn't to inherit anything until the age of 25. The evidence surely points in other directions and certainly enough doubt to not only give Marty another trial, but also to free him. The district attorney's office has an obligation to make sure it has the right man behind bars.

The comments to this entry are closed.